Skip to content

John 20:30-31 — Many Other Signs

The text. "Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20:30-31, ESV)

The setting

These are the last verses of John's Gospel before the epilogue. Thomas has just made the confession the whole book has been aiming at — "My Lord and my God!" (20:28) — and John steps back to explain what he has been doing.

His word for Jesus' miracles is sēmeia, "signs": not raw displays of power but works that point beyond themselves. The first was at Cana, where he "manifested his glory" (2:11); the second was the healing of the official's son (4:54). John has chosen a handful and left the rest unwritten.

The cessationist reading

The argument is compact. The signs were given to produce faith; John wrote them down so that later readers could believe without seeing them; therefore the written record has taken the place of the signs, and the signs have served their purpose. It is often paired with verse 29: "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed" — read as the programme for a post-apostolic church that lives by the book rather than by sight.

This is a popular argument rather than a commentary argument, and it is usually stated in a sentence. But it is worth answering carefully, because the instinct behind it is sound: the church does live by the apostolic testimony, and it should not chase sensation.

The problems

1. The purpose clause governs the writing, not the signs

"These are written so that you may believe." The verb is "written," and its subject is "these things." The sentence tells us why John produced a book. It does not tell us why signs happen, or how long they will happen. To get cessation from it, one must add a premise the sentence does not contain: that signs existed only to produce this book.

2. The record is selective, and John says so

"Many other signs... which are not written in this book." John's book is a selection from an abundance, and the last verse of the epilogue makes the abundance explicit: "Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written" (21:25). If the written record replaced the signs, the omitted signs would be superfluous. John's point is not that the signs are over; it is that his book is a handful from a harvest.

3. The same Gospel promises greater works and the Spirit forever

In the same book, Jesus says, "whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father" (14:12), and promises "another Helper, to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth" (14:16-17). The Spirit "will guide you into all the truth" and "declare to you the things that are to come" (16:13). John did not think the purpose statement of chapter 20 contradicted the promises of chapter 14. The full argument is made in greater works.

4. The logic would abolish preaching and the sacraments

If a sufficient book makes the Spirit's further activity unnecessary, it makes preaching unnecessary too — but "faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ" (Romans 10:17). It makes the Supper and baptism unnecessary, and prayer, and the assembly. Yet John's own churches gathered to hear this book read and to break bread. The sufficiency of Scripture is not the exclusivity of the Spirit's means; the same distinction answers the argument from 2 Timothy 3:16-17, which is treated in Scripture is profitable.

5. John's churches were told to test spirits

"Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world" (1 John 4:1). The command presupposes that prophetic claims were being made in the churches of John's circle, and that some were false. You do not write a test for an extinct phenomenon. The test is christological — every spirit that confesses Jesus Christ come in the flesh is from God (4:2) — which is exactly how a continuing prophecy would be judged.

6. The purpose is believing for life, which the gifts also serve

"that you may believe... and that by believing you may have life in his name." The goal is not information but life, and the gifts serve the same goal. When an outsider enters a gathering where the church prophesies, "the secrets of his heart are disclosed, and so, falling on his face, he will worship God and declare that God is really among you" (1 Corinthians 14:24-25). Paul's own preaching came "in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God" (1 Corinthians 2:4-5). Same purpose, different means.

The continuationist reading

John writes so that readers who never saw Jesus may believe, and the Spirit he promised continues to make the risen Christ known — through the word, and through the church's life, including its gifts. The book is not a replacement for the Spirit. It is a witness to the Word, written by the Spirit's inspiration, and it tells us to expect the Spirit's ongoing work.

The sign does not compete with the Scripture. Both point to Christ. A church can have the book and still miss the power the book describes; the answer is not to read it less, but to read it as it is.

What this does and does not prove

It proves: that the verse's purpose is the writing of the Gospel, not the cessation of signs; that the record is explicitly selective; that the same Gospel promises the Spirit's permanent presence; that the argument's logic would abolish other means; and that John's churches expected prophetic claims to be tested.

It does not prove: that signs are guaranteed to every believer; that the canon is open; or that experience outranks Scripture. It proves that this verse cannot be made to say that the signs have ended.

Further reading

  • D. A. Carson, The Gospel According to John (Pillar, Eerdmans, 1991), on 20:30-31.
  • Craig S. Keener, The Gospel of John: A Commentary (Hendrickson, 2003).
  • Andreas J. Köstenberger, John (BECNT, Baker Academic, 2004).
  • Marianne Meye Thompson, John: A Commentary (New Testament Library, Westminster John Knox, 2015).

See also