Skip to content

Justin, Irenaeus, and the Second Century

If the gifts had died with the apostles, the middle of the second century is where the death certificate should be filed. Instead it gives us the two strongest witnesses in the patristic record: a philosopher defending the faith in Rome, and a bishop defending it in Gaul, both pointing to healings, exorcisms, prophecy, and tongues as things happening in churches they knew.

Neither was a mystic on the margins. Justin ran a Christian school in the imperial capital and was denounced by a rival philosopher. Irenaeus was a bishop in a colony that had just been through persecution, and as a boy he had listened to Polycarp, who had known John. These are the church's public defenders, and they made the gifts part of their defence.

The claim

A second-century bishop, writing against heretics, appealed to the continuing gifts as public, checkable evidence. That is the shape of the argument, and it is decisive for the historical question. A man does not build a case on evidence he believes has ceased. And if the gifts had plainly ceased, the opponents he was answering — literate, local, and highly motivated — would have said so.

Justin: the gifts are public, and the exorcisms are in the street

Justin Martyr was a pagan philosopher from Samaria who converted in the 130s and taught at Rome until his execution around AD 165. In the Dialogue with Trypho he makes a claim that would be strange if the gifts had ended a generation earlier: the prophetic gifts have moved from Israel to the church. Prophecy has ceased among the Jews, he says, and continues among the Christians — and he offers the exorcisms as the proof.

The proof is deliberately public. In the same work (the passage usually cited as chapter 85) he says that every demon, adjured in the name of Jesus, "is overcome and subdued," while the same demon ignores the names of Israel's kings, prophets, and patriarchs. This is not a claim about the apostolic age. It is an offer of a test: try the names, and see which one works.

In the Second Apology, addressed to the Roman senate, he makes the same offer to the state. He speaks of "numberless demoniacs" throughout the world and in Rome itself, people whom the pagan exorcists, the incantations, and the drugs could not help, and who were cured by Christians speaking the name of Jesus. The claim is worth pausing over. Justin is telling the Roman authorities that there is a public, repeatable phenomenon by which the Christian message may be judged. He is not naive about the alternatives; he knows the other exorcists exist, and he says they fail where the name of Jesus succeeds.

Nor is he promoting a spiritual elite. In the Dialogue (chapter 39) converts receive gifts "each as he is worthy" — understanding, counsel, strength, healing, foreknowledge, teaching, the fear of God. The list echoes Isaiah's sevenfold Spirit, and Justin applies it to ordinary baptized people. That is the ecclesiology of 1 Corinthians 12:7, not a church that has outsourced the Spirit to its founders.

Irenaeus: the gifts as evidence against the Gnostics

Irenaeus became bishop of Lyons around AD 177, after the persecution that killed his predecessor. Around 180 he published Against Heresies, the great refutation of the Valentinian and Marcionite systems. It is a work of theology, not a chronicle, but it contains one of the most important passages in the patristic literature on this subject.

In book 2, arguing that the body will be raised, he appeals to what the church already experiences: Christians drive out demons, some see visions and prophesy, some heal the sick by laying on hands, and — the clause that has never been answered — "the dead even have been raised up," and those raised remained with them for many years (Against Heresies 2.32.4). The argument is not decorative. Irenaeus is reasoning from the present power of the Spirit to the future resurrection of the body: if the Spirit who raised Christ dwells in you, the same Spirit will raise your mortal body (Romans 8:11). Take away the present gifts and the premise collapses. That is why he lists them.

In book 5 he describes "many brethren in the church" who have prophetic gifts, speak in all kinds of languages, and disclose hidden things through the Spirit (Against Heresies 5.6.1). The phrase "many brethren" matters: not a single wonder-worker at a shrine, but a broad, ordinary distribution, exactly what Paul described.

The setting is polemical, and that is the point. Irenaeus is not a naive enthusiast. He is a bishop with a rule of faith, a fixed fourfold Gospel, and a fight on his hands against teachers who claimed special spiritual knowledge. He argues that the Gnostics cannot do what the church does: they do not heal the sick, they do not cast out demons, they do not raise the dead. The gifts are his evidence that the Spirit is with the church and not with the sects.

Consider what that means for the canon argument. The canon reading of 1 Corinthians 13:10 says the gifts ended when the canon was completed. But the man who gave us the argument for the fourfold Gospel — the four Gospels as the church's four pillars, in Against Heresies 3.11 — is the same man who reports the gifts as present. In Irenaeus, Scripture and Spirit are not rivals: the church has the apostolic books and the apostolic gifts. The canon-versus-gifts opposition would have puzzled him.

Why the second century matters

The reports are early and close to the source: Irenaeus's boyhood memories of Polycarp put him one link away from John, so these are not the pious legends of a later age. They are also public and falsifiable. Justin invites the senate to check the exorcisms; Irenaeus tells readers that the dead have been raised and the raised are still with them, a claim his own congregation could confirm or deny.

Above all, the gifts are embedded in doctrine, not bolted on. When Irenaeus argues for the resurrection from the church's healings, he treats the gifts as the firstfruits of the age to come — an understanding the New Testament shares.

What this does and does not prove

It proves: that in the second century, two of the church's most careful defenders publicly appealed to healings, exorcisms, prophecy, and tongues as present realities; that Irenaeus tied the gifts to the church's identity over against heretical sects; and that the canon argument sits awkwardly with the church's actual memory, since the same generation that fixed the fourfold Gospel reported the gifts.

It does not prove: that every report was accurate, that the gifts were present in every congregation, or that Irenaeus's theology of succession is ours. He is a witness, not an authority. But he had every reason to be careful, and no reason to invent an argument his opponents could refute by looking around.

Further reading

  • Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, trans. Thomas B. Falls (Fathers of the Church, Catholic University of America Press).
  • Irenaeus, Against Heresies, in Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1 (public domain; the translation used above).

See also