Skip to content

Evidence and Testimony: Index

Why the evidence comes fourth

The case in this book is made from Scripture first. The silence of Scripture carries the weight: no text promises, commands, or predicts that the gifts would cease, and the one passage that speaks of their ending places it at the return of Christ. That is the argument. Everything in this section is corroboration.

The order cuts both ways. A thousand cures would not make a text say what it does not say; a hundred frauds would not make it say less. A casebook that began with the latest healing report would be arguing from experience to doctrine — the move this site refuses (experience is not doctrine).

But exegesis alone leaves a question standing. Cessationism is also a claim about what has happened since the apostles: that the gifts stopped, and that the church's memory is of a closed age. That claim is historical, and history can test it — at the level of particular reports, documents, and investigations.

The four kinds of evidence

Method. How to weigh a testimony sets out the ordinary tests — proximity, independence, the hostile witness, documentation made at the time, publicity, specificity, alternative explanations, the witness's stake, falsifiability, persistence under investigation. None of them is special pleading for religion; they are the tests a court or a historian uses. The page also faces Hume, because the philosophical objection has to be answered before the reports can be weighed.

The source library. The source library is a hundred references, graded by deniability — how easily the entry can be set aside. It runs from legend and devotional anecdote at one end to peer-reviewed studies and hostile newspapers at the other, and is deliberately ordered weakest first.

Case studies. Two cases, chosen because each is strong in a different way. The Mozambique study is strong empirically: a peer-reviewed field study that measured hearing and vision before and after prayer in a Protestant setting. Azusa Street is strong publicly: a hostile newspaper reporting the phenomenon within days, at a named address, at real cost to the people involved.

The objections. The academy and the miraculous is a meta-argument: the claim that no serious scholar takes miracle reports seriously is simply false, and the existence of a field changes the burden. The skeptic's case then states the strongest objections — Hume, fraud, selectivity, the uncontrolled mission-field setting, the authentication argument, the pastoral harm — and answers them as honestly as the case allows.

The pages

Page What it does
How to Weigh a Testimony Sets the ten tests, answers Hume, and explains why no single case is load-bearing.
The Source Library One hundred graded references, from legend to peer review, ordered by deniability.
The Mozambique Study A peer-reviewed field study of prayer and sensory impairment: method, results, and limits.
The Press and Azusa Street A hostile 1906 newspaper report, and what a hostile witness can and cannot establish.
The Academy and the Miraculous Keener, Brown, Mullin, Wacker, Jenkins, and Pew: the field that is said not to exist.
The Skeptic's Case, Stated Fairly The strongest objections, answered, and the points on which the sceptic is right.

How to read it

If you are a continuationist, read the case studies as discipline rather than ammunition: they show what a claim looks like when it has been examined, and how much of the ordinary heap does not survive. If you are a cessationist, read the library from the bottom up, and stop wherever you can. The question is not whether every report is genuine, but whether any survive an honest examination — and whether the doctrine of cessation can survive the reports it has to explain away.

See also